Classic Quad 405-2 Amplifier Restoration

I recently acquired a classic Quad 405-2 power amplifier. Come along as I restore this beautiful amplifier.

The Quad 405-2 is still revered, some 40 years after its release. These are truly special amplifiers, don’t let the understated English looks fool you. What almost all of them need however is work, so come along for this Quad 405-2 restoration.

For some extra reading, check out my Quad 405-2 review and Quad 405 refresh.

The Design

This amp is a Quad 405-2, but the 405 and 405-2 are quite similar. They are masterpieces of clever, understated design and showcase the less-is-more approach of Quad’s legendary engineer, Peter Walker.

I can’t think of a mainstream commercial amplifier with fewer parts than the Quad 405. Sure, there is an IC in the front-end to keep the parts count down, but the driver stage is just two TO-220 devices operating in class-A. The output stage is another two N-channel TO-3 devices per channel. No complimentary pair mismatching here.

The driver and output transistors are thermally coupled to a block of aluminium and board-mounted, eliminating wiring. Add a sprinkling of passive components of very high quality and you have the elegant simplicity that is the Quad 405 amplifier module.

Quad 405-2


Much has been written about the remarkable Quad 405-2 and 405. Check out my review of the Quad 405 / 405-2, and another article I wrote about Quad 405 servicing. One of my favourite resources is Keith Snook’s fantastic Quad repository.

Keith breaks things down into two large and very detailed sections. The first covers the original 405 and its various iterations, the second covers the 405-2, and its various iterations. Keith’s site is a wealth of information and you’ll also find the service manual along with all revisions and parts lists.


Let’s get going with this Quad 405-2 restoration. I tend to utilise a less-is-more approach to my work, not senselessly changing parts that are perfectly good. To that end, transistors, resistors and most other parts remain stock. Quad used excellent parts in most places and most are perfect, so why change them?

My 405 needed some TLC. The seller told me it was ‘restored’. I was keen to see what that actually meant, but it turns out it means something very different to me and this can be annoying. The amp was also damaged during shipping. I claimed for this through eBay and was refunded the purchase price.

Apart from that, mine has two different amp modules, one version apart. Quad made something like 10 revisions of the 405/405-2, improving them as they went. This is of no real consequence in a dual mono amp like this, and I’ve since acquired a matching module, but an original must have blown up at some point.

Quad had a simple repair policy – order a new module and screw it in place, job done. My amp contained a few original and dead caps, some old chewed-out screws and other bits and pieces that I decided to sort out. Let’s have a look inside…

Quad 405-2
So far, so good. Original filter capacitors could do with changing and see if you can spot the non-original, but old axial electrolytic cap. Note the neat, typically British, wiring loom.
There she is. Some caps have been replaced, but others are original. Not great for a so-called ‘restored’ amp!
I removed the diode bridge and applied some thermal paste before securing back in place.
Quad 405-2
First board, note the unpotted protection modules, original RCA output devices, messy thermal paste and original ERO capacitor. But what a great layout – almost no wiring, drivers and output transistors thermally coupled and just a small number of really good quality parts. You can see why these are so lovable from technical and design standpoints.
Both boards removed, along with the thermal paste
Quad 405-2
Right, so side-by-side, one can see the variations between the version 6 and 7 boards. On the left is a version 7 board. Note the date codes on the output devices dating this board to 1985. On the right is a version 6 board, from 1983. Some resistor types are different, plus a few different small signal transistors. Thermal paste cleaned from around output transistors…
Back of the boards reveals some factory markings and a slightly different trace layout between versions 6 and 7.
This design is so simple and elegant, I really love it.
In detail now, version 6 board with 1983 output transistors
While version 7 board devices are from 1985, all RCA.
Unpotted current-limiters…
Vs potted current-limiters
Anyway, time to replace a few capacitors with modern, high-spec replacements

Out with some old capacitors…
And in with some lovely Nichicon MUSE bipolar caps to replace these terrible Capxon Chinese parts. I also use Panasonic, Nippon-Chemicon and Elna parts in restorations like this.
Quad 405-2
They sound seriously good
Quad 405-2
Next, I decided to bypass the main filter caps. I used some of my military-grade Siemens film caps and used the 405 like this until I replaced the main filter capacitors.

Further Quad 405-2 Mods

The 405-2 sounded much better after replacing the old board-mounted capacitors. I initially decided against changing the TL-071 op-amps for a number of reasons. Firstly, I’m against the forum-driven, non-scientific craze of just swapping op-amps because someone said they should sound better. What’s better, and smarter, is to try to understand the reasons behind the choices originally made. Then one can see if there is a better, modern replacement.

For noise performance, low DC offsets and low distortion, the FET input TL-071 is an excellent choice, and still a great op-amp, despite what you might read. The TL2071 is an excellent modern replacement and I can verify that in this amplifier they make a significant difference.

Filter Capacitors

The remaining important mod was to replace the original filter capacitors with modern, higher-spec parts. STC branded 10,000uF @ 63V parts came factory-fitted. I replaced these with premium Kemet 15,000uF capacitors. The Kemet parts sound better and are rated for longer service life. Before doing so, I examined the increased inrush current to ensure this was within limitations of the diode bridge.

By the way, this is how NOT to replace the filter capacitors. This photo was sent by a friend of mine and shows what he found inside a Quad 405 he worked on recently. This is awful, lazy work and there’s no need for it when you can just use parts of the correct size or replace the capacitor clamps!

The original STC filter caps measured quite badly. Capacitance was OK, but ESR was quite high for large caps. We should see an ESR of very close to 0 Ohms for large caps, measured using a proper ESR meter. The STC caps measured around 0.5 Ohms, which is too high. The new Kemet parts were as close to zero as you can get, at around 0.01 Ohms, plus they have 50% greater capacitance, so this is a worthwhile improvement.

There are a couple of improvement I’ve subsequently made and incorporate into most customer jobs. The first is to replace a couple of ceramic caps in the critical bridge circuit with polystyrene or silver mica parts. Second is to replace the TL-071 input op-amps with the modern TL-2071 equivalent. Other FET input op-amps work as well. I’ve had great success with Texas Instruments OPA-604.

Quad 405-2
Note, this amp has been modified previously, adding the two RCA connectors on the left, where the rubber service access plugs used to be. Mine has the recessed banana plugs and no power switch!
Replacements looming in the background!
VERY nice parts, made in the EU
My goal was to ensure the replacement parts looked factory and to re-use the existing wiring. I wanted to make the minimum number of changes needed to do the job. Part of doing this involved carefully choosing the new caps so they were a perfect size-match. This turned out well, it looks neat and I’m not sure you could tell if you didn’t know what the originals looked like. New filter caps provide greatly improved performance.
Quad 405-2
Another angle on the replacement filter capacitors. The amp sounds remarkably improved with these new filter capacitors. The old ones didn’t test so good, one has quite high ESR. The new parts were as close to zero ohms as one would expect of premium parts.

The Chassis

To complete the Quad 405-2 restoration and because of the damage incurred during shipping, I decided to replace the screws with new zinc-plated parts. New fasteners were easy to find at my local fasteners supplier, yours too I’m sure. They made a big difference to the appearance of my Quad 405-2.

The last thing is a new side panel to replace the dented one, ordered from Quad UK and on its way. That isn’t here yet and so does not feature in these images – yet!

This is what happens to Quad 405 fasteners when you drop the thing on its end! It’s lucky the damage wasn’t worse.
New fasteners really lift the appearance of a piece of audio equipment and are much nicer to work with.
Amplifier modules and side panels secured by new fasteners and washers. Note the original filter caps – I did the chassis stuff prior to changing these.
Same for this side. I’ve used fresh thermal paste to mate each module to front panel heatsink.
These new parts lift the look of the Quad and are much nicer to work with. The finished amplifier looks and sounds fantastic now, a huge improvement. I will update this page with any other work I decide to do.

I hope you’ve enjoyed this Quad 405-2 restoration. If you would like me to take care of your Quad 405 or 405-2, you need only visit my contact page.

18 thoughts on “Classic Quad 405-2 Amplifier Restoration”

  1. Hi Mike,

    I have a 44Mk1/405-2 i wish to service. In your guide you have replaced some of the caps on both units but it would be helpful if stated which caps, values and locations, with this information i can acquire the correct parts before hand and service the units in one go so reducing the ‘down time’. Serial No are:- 4022 and 43466 for pre and power respectively.

    Thank you in advance,


    1. Hi Andrew and thanks for your question. I’ve not included all the details as that isn’t really the aim of my article. There are many sites out there that cover the DIY angle, mine is more about showing the sort of work I do for my customers and highlighting best practice vs common practice, as well as giving back to the hi-fi community in general with reviews, tech info, inside info etc. You can access the service data in many places including via my article from memory though. Just be careful, take your time and use the best tools and parts you can, along with expert sources of info.

  2. Hi Mike,
    What are components which are included in the Quad 405-2 upgrading kit and what’s the cost of it?
    Also let me know the difference between 405 – 2 and 405 – 3?
    Please Email me.

    1. Hi Lalith, thanks for your message. There is no Quad 405-2 kit, we don’t sell kits for a few reasons, check out my FAQs for more on this. The work we do is tailored to suit the customer and equipment. I am happy to improve your Quad 405 for you, but I’d need it here to be able to do that. If you live locally, get in touch when I reopen after January 15 and I’d be very happy to chat about your requirements!

  3. hello there Mike,
    I have a 405 and a 303 and I connect the power plug from the 405 to the back of the 303, so when I turn the 303 on it also turns the 405 on. but the 303 mains plug says max. 2A. and the 405 as you mentioned gets to 2.5A maximum current. do you think this can be an issue to the power circuit of the 303?
    thank you,
    Filipe Enes

    1. Hi Filipe, no I think that this arrangement will work OK. Better to give the 405 it’s own separate power of course, but if you leave it as is, the 303 should be fine.

      1. thanks for your quick answer. thinking of restoring my 303, any advice on where to focus my attention? (promise this will be my last question :))

        1. Hi Filipe, the 303 is a fairly simple pre, but the usual areas should be addressed – switches and controls, caps which tend to leak in these, power supply and so on. There are a few useful improvements that can be made. Be careful as leaking caps often cause board damage, which must be repaired.

  4. Thanks! Concerning the 15000uf caps, i was told big caps are slow to charge and discharge therefore give a slow kind of sound, that paralleling a few small caps is better as these are faster. Naim audio do this as mentioned on their site. Do you think there is any merit to this, perhaps at higher frequencies.
    2. There is the advantage of lower esr and higher ripple current with paralleling, do you think this may help to increase sound quality.

    Thank you. Richard.

    1. Hi Richard, thanks for your questions. Unfortunately, these comments that people make, such as that big caps are slow to charge or sound slow are just not technically or actually correct. The capacitors stay charged while the amplifier is running and in terms of speed, some of the worlds greatest amplifiers, like those made by Mark Levinson, Krell, Accuphase and so on, use a small number of very large caps, to great effect. These amplifiers definitely cannot be classed as slow in any sense. More capacitance is generally a good thing though, and this can be achieved by multiple small, or a few large caps. Smaller caps are cheaper and easier to implement in a circuit, this may explain why some manufacturers have gone down this route. Multiple good small caps will also present a very low power supply impedance which is a good thing. Super low impedance, ESR and high ripple current can also be achieved with correct board layout and implementation of a few very large caps, so no real advantage there. Both can achieve the desired outcome if correctly implemented.

  5. Hi. Why did you not upgrade the stock bridge rectifier? It is only rated at 7 amps. Do bridge rectifiers not affect audio quality?

    Thank you. Richard.

    1. Hi Richard and thanks for your question. There’s a long answer to this and a shorter one, which I’ll try to stick to here. The 405 is rated to draw a maximum current of 2.5A @ 240V, 5A @ 110/120V. I have looked up the bridge rectifier previously and it’s rated for at least 7A, more from memory, but either way, this is way more than the current draw of this amp under real musical conditions. Remember that the rating of 2.5A is for a slow acting fuse, so there’s some integration of current over time there. In the real world, the bridge is just coasting along. In addition, it’s compact and has a nice heatsink tab on it. I always add thermal compound underneath, so that they are really well coupled to the heatsink. One DOES have to consider the inrush current imposed on the bridge if/when increasing the size of the main filter capacitors. I’ve done the calcs on this and the bridge was good for even the fairly major increase I made on a customer amp recently, to 2 x 18,000uF. This will impose an increased load on the bridge though, so be aware of this. In terms of ‘upgrading’ parts, we really do have to be careful and focus on the science. Other bridges won’t really sound any different to this bridge, but what we do around the bridge is important and will affect the sound. For example, installing snubber caps across each diode in the bridge is an excellent idea and will improve the sound of the amp overall. Thanks again for visiting and don’t hesitate to ask more questions if you have them!

    1. Hi Paul, yes you’ve hit the nail on the head there, that’s more or less how I would describe it. Very good match, helps tame some of the NS-1000 sparkle. Mike

  6. Mike,
    Since you have done the hard work on this, could you tell me the Mouser part number for the large 15,000 µF capacitors?
    I have one of these 44/405 Quad combos which I bought on my way to Australia in 1981 and it is still going strong. The only thing I had to replace in 405 were the two pairs of electrolytics (47µF & 100µF) which dried out and made it hum. I also fix audio in Wanneroo and it looked bad when my own amp in the workshop badly hummed. Now is much better but when I really crank it up there is still some residual hum which I am hoping these large things will fix.

    1. Hi Roman

      Thanks for making contact and I think we’ve perhaps chatted on the phone before – you rang me about fixing your oscilloscope, was that you? Anyway, that parts order was many orders ago so I can’t tell you what the part number was without some digging around unfortunately. You’ll be able to find these though by taking some measurements and using the parametric filters in Mouser. As I recall, they were about $10 each. There are of course lots of other options, but Kemet parts are superb quality and these have a lug style that allows re-use of the existing wiring set-up, for skilled solderers! Definitely worth doing.

      Also be aware (if not already) that the 405 is notorious for hum if its been messed with and not wired correctly. They can hum for example when RCA connectors are changed. Depending on board version, this can be quite an annoyance. The trick is to pay very careful attention to the schematic for your version and check the ground arrangement and wiring of the RCA connectors.

      Let me know how you go!


      1. Thanks Mike for your response.
        Will search for the caps at Mouser site.
        We did chat one day but I don’t think it was about the oscilloscope. I have two of them and they both work fine.
        I might have been interested in your Laser power meter. I seem to be mainly fixing CD players and whereas in Philips based machines it is not so crucial, Sony and Sanyo based units have a myriad of pots to adjust and a meter could come in handy (perhaps). They are about $150 to $200 at Wes and I do not know how useful they are. I currently have one of the Roksan Caspian players with Sanyo mech and board and it is time to bite the bullet and start working on it :-).
        If you have a free afternoon one day, why don’t you come over to Wanneroo for a coffee and a chat (and maybe a glass of the vino)?

        1. Hi Roman
          No problem, yes a laser power meter is a very handy thing to have, I also fix a few CD players, don’t you love the ones with all the adjustments for tracking and focus?! I think the Roksan players are particularly horrible to work on, I hope this one is not too bad for you. I’d would definitely like to drop by for a chat, let me know your details (email me at and we can arrange it!

Feel free to share your thoughts and leave a comment!