You are currently viewing Quad 405/405-2 Power Amplifier Review

Quad 405/405-2 Power Amplifier Review

In this second article in my Quad 405 series, I review the legendary Quad 405-2. Find out why so many love these great little amplifiers and why you should buy one – a real one.

The Quad 405 was and remains an incredible little amplifier, even now, some 40+ years after it was introduced to the world. This article you are reading right now is one of the most popular articles on my entire site. That should tell you something about the Quad 405’s enduring qualities and how people are drawn to these lovely amplifiers.

For more, check out my updated Quad 405-2 restoration and Quad 405 refresh articles!

Tellingly, the Quad 405 and 405-2 are most loved by those for whom listening to music is more important than looking at power meters, fiddling with controls and discussing technical specifications. It’s curious, but this little industrially styled amplifier punches well above its weight, all these years later.

Don’t get me wrong, I love power meters, but the 405 is a study in elegant, stripped back, understated design. It’s a true champion of the ‘less is more’ philosophy and an amplifier that just gets out of the way and plays music. Surely this is what every true hi-fi lover wants in an amplifier?

Is it just me or does the 405 look like it came straight out of the 1940s?

Quad 405 vs 405-2

The Quad 405 and 405-2 are almost identical, compact, heavy, power amplifiers. Both punch out 100 watts per channel, into 8 ohms. Where they differ is in their ability to deliver current into lower impedances.

Specifically, Quad modified the current limiting circuitry of 405-2 to be a little less aggressive. There’s a wider power envelope with the 405-2, allowing it to better drive lower impedance loads. If you own current-hungry speakers or those with a nominal 4 ohm impedance, a 405-2 is the better option.

Quad also implemented various iterative improvements over a long period. In my opinion, the later amplifiers sound and perform slightly better. If you are interested in more technical detail, I recently overhauled a Quad 405-2 and you should also check out the ‘Further Reading’ section at the end of this article.


Quad’s legendary design engineer, Peter Walker, utilised a principle called ‘feedforward error correction’ in the 405 design. He wrote a paper about it, which you can read here.

This is a schematic, representing a typical iteration of the 405 layout. Note that this is one entire channel, minus the power supply transformer. Not a lot there really…

As Stereophile pointed out in their review of the original 405:

“This is something we don’t see too often: an entirely new approach to power amplifier design. As Quad points out in its literature for the 405, class-A operation of transistors provides the lowest distortion, but drastically limits the amount of power an output transistor can deliver without overheating. (Most transistor amps use class-AB output operation, in which each of a pair of power transistors handles part of each signal cycle and shuts down during the other part.

Imperfect synchronism between the two halves causes the familiar “crossover distortion,” which accounts for most solid-state sound. In class-A operation, each output transistor draws current though the entirety of each signal cycle, eliminating the crossover transition but doubling the amount of time current is drawn, and thus tending to cause the transistor to heat up more.)

In “current dumping,” a low-powered, low-distortion class-A amplifier is used to control the amount of current passing through a pair of heavy-duty “dumping” transistors, and it is the latter which provide the driving power (100Wpc) for the speakers.”

Stereophile didn’t particularly like the original 405, but they reviewed the 405-2 much more favourably.

Elegant Design

The Quad 405 and 405-2 are compact, measuring just 115 x 340.5 x 195mm. At 9kg, this a small, dense amplifier, heavy for its size. The 405 is able to deliver 100 watts per channel, more than enough to drive most speakers. I can’t think of a commercially available amplifier that’s more compact, with fewer parts or with a simpler layout than the Quad 405. Tell me if you know of one.

The driver stage consists of two TO-220 devices operating in class-A. The output stage utilises two identical N-channel TO-3 devices, per channel. The driver stage is of very high-quality, the output amp is the ‘current dumper’ and is a less precise, more robust unit operating in class-B.

This is one entire amplifier channel. Note that there are literally around 50 parts, per channel.

The driver and output transistors are thermally coupled to one block of aluminium. Everything is board-mounted, there’s almost no wiring. The assembly forms one amplifier module, there are two modules per chassis. This is evident in the images above and below.

Thermal coupling helps lower distortion and the design as a whole minimises wiring and maximises serviceability. It really is genius in terms of packaging and miniaturisation at a time before SMD manufacturing.

Notice how compact the amplifier modules are, each one roughly the size of your hand.

The two amplifier modules make up virtually all the electronics in a 405 / 405-2. Other elements include a superb-quality potted transformer, two 10,000uF filter capacitors, a diode bridge, some power supply wiring, a large front-mounted heatsink and some sockets. As a repairer, the Quad 405 series amplifiers are just about the easiest to service if you know what you are doing.

The entire amplifier consists of the chassis, power transformer, two filter capacitors and two amplifier boards. The whole thing comes completely apart in minutes.

405-2 Specifications (Courtesy Hi-Fi Engine)

  • Power output: 100 watts per channel into 8Ω
  • Frequency response: 20Hz to 20kHz
  • Total harmonic distortion: 0.05%
  • Input sensitivity: 0.5V
  • Signal to noise ratio: 96dB
  • Speaker load impedance: 4Ω to 16Ω
  • Dimensions: 115 x 340.5 x 195mm
  • Weight: 9kg

Effortless Sound

Quantifying sound quality isn’t easy but let’s get this out of the way – the Quad 405 and 405-2 are beautiful sounding amplifiers and amongst my favourite solid-state designs. They aren’t the best at any one thing, but what they do well, they do very well. From the moment you hear one you’ll enjoy relaxed, effortless and fatigue-free listening.

Overall, the Quad 405 errs on the warmer, mellower side. A 405 adds little in terms of distortion, something you’ll hear in the relaxed flow of music and long periods of fatigue-free listening possible with one. If you find a 405 that doesn’t sound smooth, there’s something wrong with it or with another part of your system.

I work plenty of 405s and 405-2s and whenever I test one, I’m taken by how incredibly sweet they sound. The lack of glare is noticeable and unusual with solid-state gear.

This is going too far, but you probably understand what I mean!


Some describe the 405 as sounding rolled off, but I disagree. To me, these amplifiers sound smooth and lacking that edgy quality of many transistor amplifiers. Measurements don’t support the claim of a rolled off top-end, but it’s not a fast, wide-bandwidth amplifier by any means. It’s also unlikely to blow up like one either!

Bass is clean and rich but lacks the last word in slam and authority. If anything, its the bass that’s rolled off to my ears and keep in mind that these amplifiers do have an input filter. There’s no ‘bass bloom’ here to flatter small speakers though, just clean, accurate bass. Remember, this amp has just one pair of output devices per channel.

The midrange is warm, resolved and three-dimensional with good source material. This is definitely a strength of the 405-2, like a good valve amplifier perhaps. Sound staging works to enhance this feeling of three-dimensional realism and pinpoint imaging.

Overall, a good, fresh Quad 405 or 405-2 is a beautiful sounding amplifier. My only criticisms are a slight lack of sparkle, air and deep bass compared with the very best. These audible traits separate the 405 and 405-2 from the very best I’ve heard in my listening room, like the Perreaux PMF-5150B, Krell KSA-150 and BAT VK-500.

These limitations are dramatically addressed however with a series of improvements that I now implement in these amplifiers, customer budget allowing of course.

Quad 405 Serviceability

The Quad 405 is an easy amplifier to work on compared to most. The whole unit can be completely apart and broken down to board level in minutes. You can even remove the side panels and work on a module whilst it’s still bolted to the chassis. Check out some of my Quad 405 work here and here.

Quad 405-2
Here’s a customer Quad 405-2 with modules out, ready for a complete overhaul and a full series of improvements.

All electronic parts are replaceable with modern equivalents, but original factory parts quality is very high. The only issue that is the 405-2 current limiting sub-boards are no longer available, but even this is no real problem. You can remove them altogether if you like to operate with no protection, the amp will work fine without them. Better still, they’ve been reverse engineered and are available from Dada Electronics for example.

Furthermore, the popularity of the Quad 405 and 405-2 has spurred the development of a range of modern replacement modules. Some are rubbish, like these cheap Chinese boards found on eBay for example. But others look amazing, like the NET Audio 405-3 boards, unfortunately no longer available. I had a customer who owned two ‘405-3’ amplifiers contact me and we chatted for a while about how good these modules sounded! More on what they sound like here.

NET Audio 405-3 board

Clones & Cheap Knock-Offs

On this point, I’m often asked about the cheap boards and 405 clones found on eBay. Check the comments and you’ll see I’ve had long discussions with readers about this. Understandably, those without experience working on electronics and comparing replicas to the real thing will have questions like this.

Let me draw a parallel with replica watches. Just like a real Rolex or Omega, the real 405 contains genuine parts rather than cheap fakes made to look real. The original parts are of very high quality, especially the transformer, chassis, heatsinks etc. The fakes are often the lowest grade, made to look genuine.

Fake Quad 405
These fake ‘Brezze Audio’ Quad 405 boards are fairly typical of what’s out there. I don’t suggest you attach speakers of any value to boards like these.

Did you know that the superb original transformer makes a huge contribution to the sound? Don’t even get me started on semiconductors and how important these are. China is the number one source of counterfeit semiconductors and most are simply rebadged versions of super-cheap parts, made to look vintage.

A real 405 or 405 board contains the real design DNA from the original design. Replicas often have redrawn boards and circuit changes. They have absolutely no performance guarantees and are built and sold by people simply cashing in on the desirability of the original product and on the number of buyers looking to find a ‘bargain’.

Would you wear a fake Rolex, lacking all the quality elements of the real thing? Do you believe that knock-off parts made to look like the real thing are electrically the same as the originals? Do you think a clone at $500 – $1000 AUD, with a crappy case and heatsinks, filled with fake parts is good value?

If so, maybe a clone is for you. For everyone else, I can assure you that replicas and counterfeit parts are no bargain, they are just a waste of money. A real Quad 405-2, made in England, with original parts, for just a few hundred bucks is one of the few genuine bargains in hi-fi. Save up, buy the real thing and you’ll be helping not fund the production of counterfeits and replicas.

System Matching

People also often ask me questions about “what would go best with this” and so on. For a long time, I ran my Quad 405-2 with a pair of Yamaha NS-1000M monitors. This is an excellent match, the slightly mellower sound of the Quad 405-2 is a great partner to the airy clarity of the wonderful NS-1000.

Many will also be aware of the legendary Quad electrostatic speakers like the ESL-57 and later ESL-63. Quad designed the 405 and 405-2 to run these speakers, so this is also an excellent match. As a general rule, the 405 and 405/2 lack really deep, tight bass though, so don’t expect one to drive your Infinity Kappas, it just won’t work. The Quad is better suited to small to medium-sized speakers of moderate sensitivity.

Overhaul & Upgrade

Quad 405s and 405-2s currently sell for around $500 – 750 AUD. They would be a deal even at $1500, so they are a fabulous buy for less. Seriously, what else can you get that sounds this good for 500 bucks? The best thing is the understatement of these lovely amplifiers, like fine pieces of 1950’s English industrial art.

It’s a very good idea to have your 405 or 405-2 overhauled if it hasn’t been. Many are running original capacitors and parts, a testament to their durability, but they can be dramatically improved. This is something I’ve been doing now for a while now, with great results.

A full restoration is an even better idea. I do quite a bit as part of the complete overhaul and upgrade process I’ve developed for these amplifiers. This includes output matched devices, thermal pads, op-amps, special MIL-spec silver mica capacitors, various premium electrolytic capacitors, new lab-grade power supply caps and more. Everything has been carefully chosen and assessed.

Nice neat installation of two lab-grade, uprated power supply capacitors with premium bypass package.

I’ve had customers ask if it’s worth upgrading a 405 or 405-2. Consider that to replace a 405 or 405-2 with something probably not as good, will cost $5000 AUD or more. With this in mind, spending a few hundred dollars to refresh and seriously improve your Quad is one of the great audio no-brainers.

Have a go if you know what you are doing, but if you don’t, spend the money and have the work expertly done. I’ve seen too many of these amps where people have fiddled and caused problems. Consider what could you be doing to earn money while an expert works on your amplifiers instead!

Further Reading

The Stereophile reviews of the 405 and 405-2 are good places to start to get your head around what people were thinking when these amplifiers were released. I’ve written a lot more about the Quad 405, including several pieces about restoration, modifications and upgrades, and servicing. Positive Feedback has a great piece, with lots of mods and other technical details. Yet another page lists more modifications and upgrades.

One of my favourite resources is Keith Snook’s fantastic Quad repository. Keith goes into detail about his own journey with the 405 and breaks things down over two large and very detailed pages. The first covers the original 405 and its various iterations, the second covers the 405-2.

The Bottom Line

If you are looking for an amp to soothe the soul, I urge you to listen to a 405 or 405-2. Better still, just grab yourself one to play with on a rainy day, you won’t regret it. If you already own a 405 or 405-2  and you’d like me to service or overhaul it for you, visit my Contact page to get in touch.

Quad 405-2 Power Amplifier

$500 - $1000AUD

Chassis / Build-Quality




Sound Quality







  • Superb build and parts quality
  • Smooth, relaxed sound
  • Ease of service
  • High reliability
  • Multi-voltage


  • Missing really bass & a little air
  • Usually no power switch
  • Minimal features

Liquid Mike

As a kid, I cherished my Tandy 200-in-1 electronics project lab and Dick Smith Funway electronics kits. I had my own little hi-fi at 16. Later, I started Liquid Audio, a specialist hi-fi equipment repair business. Keeping classic hi-fi gear alive and well is what we do. Our mission: to deliver TLC for classic Japanese, American and European hi-fi stereo equipment. In my spare time, I cook, ride, listen to music and research interesting topics.

This Post Has 27 Comments

  1. Richard Morgan

    Interesting article. Why do you think that the Chinese boards are rubbish? Looking at the circuit diagram for the 405, it’s pretty basic and the component cost won’t be a lot. With modern cad I would expect a better pcb layout to be achieved than the original along with better modern components than the original. Have you actually tried the copies to justify the comment? I’m asking as I’m looking at makin a modern ‘copy’ but adding a streaming server to it.

    1. Mike

      Hi Richard, thanks for leaving a comment and I’ll elaborate on a couple of points here that hopefully will help.

      Have a good look around my site and you’ll see that I’m a working specialist, interested in helping people make smarter, more informed choices. If I don’t have first-hand, factual information about something, I generally won’t comment on it 🙂

      With that in mind, yes I’ve seen some of the Chinese Quad boards and they were of poor quality, hence my comment. Some I’ve seen are not copies, hence you are not getting a 405, and board quality was poor. I haven’t seen all of them of course, there may be some good copies. Sadly, most Chinese hi-fi and audio boards are of low quality.

      Regarding parts, no, modern parts are not automatically better. Some modern parts are better, some are worse and the commonly available Chinese parts are usually terrible, especially capacitors and semiconductors. With Chinese kits, there is no QA re what you’re getting, no way of knowing if the CAD layout is better, it could be worse. There are so many terrible fake semiconductors and caps out there now from China that many professionals won’t buy them at all, without quality assurance from a large vendor, myself included.

      So, with these things in mind, I can’t see the point when you can buy a real Quad 405, with superb boards, transformer, case, parts and pedigree, for a few hundred bucks. There are of course the Net Audio ‘mk 3’ boards, they look good, havent heard them though.

      In my opinion, there is only one path to follow with classic audio gear that’s to get the original! It’s all about the history, the pedigree, the fact that it sounds the way it does because of the layout and the parts.

      Anyway, hope this helped!

  2. Schillers

    What pre amps would be a good match with the 405? Any benefit in running two 405s and two preamps as a dual mono (stereo) signal chain?

    1. Mike

      Hi, any high-quality, transparent preamp will work with a high-quality power amp like the 405. Obviously, synergy with the rest of your system and room is very important here, so you’d need to consider this. The 405 can be bridged and run as a mono amp, but realistically, there’s plenty of power there with the 100 Watts a side available with a single amp. It would certainly be interesting to try though!

  3. MattyW

    I’ve found that the Schiit Saga is fantastic in front of the Quad 405 with a RCA Black Plate tube in there. I’ve never heard more life like sound reproduction. The 405 is magic with Aurum Cantus F620 speakers (4 ohm).

  4. Ralph Gonzalez

    I too am curious about the Chinese 405 Clone boards. As recently as 2006 I was still able to source rebuilt boards from Quad Electronics (International Audio Group) directly from their Huntingdon address for about $90, but I don’t know whether they offer this service anymore.

    Instead I can buy a pair of boards for $50-$60 including shipping from China, such as this listing from Douk Audio:

    The other options are: spend a few weekends troubleshooting, repairing, and recalibrating the blown board myself or spend $200+ on a replacement or a professional repair.

    Have you measured or listened to any recent Clone boards? Thanks for any feedback!

    1. Mike

      Hi Ralph, thanks for your question and I realise there are a lot of misunderstandings around cloned boards. I’ve covered some of this in a previous answer but I’ve elaborated here on a couple of important points, I hope it helps.

      Yes, I have looked at some 405 clone boards and no, I cannot recommend them as a general rule. No, I’ve not seen all of them and no, I’ve not measured any clone 405 boards. I choose not to work on cloned stuff from China, read on to find out why.

      Consumer-grade Chinese boards contain generally low-grade parts of unknown specification and performance, in most cases non-genuine or fake semiconductors and are generally unqualified and of unknown performance. Clones often contain circuit changes that mean they aren’t even clones. It’s very simple, you’ll end up with an amp that isn’t a Quad 405, with unknown performance characteristics, and it’s probably not even cheaper overall!

      The original boards are well designed, easy to work on and repair, contain excellent parts of known quality, meet known performance specifications and are the real deal historically and electrically. I guess we each have to decide which elements of that are important to us. For me, originality, parts quality and verified performance are critically important.

      I completely understand that this isn’t the answer many want to hear, but it comes down to getting what you pay for. The same can be said for fake watches. At first glance, they appear very similar but dig deeper and there is a world of difference between a fake and the real thing. The devil really is in the detail.

      I mention fakes for good reason. Genuine MJ15024 output devices are around $10 each, from trusted vendors. Does this $50 purchase really contain $40 worth of genuine MJ15024 transistors? What about the cost of all the other parts, aluminium, shipping..? The BOM for these boards using genuine and known-brand parts would come to $100+. When you do some math, you’ll realise that something is amiss.

      Fake semis are highly problematic and exceptionally common in cheap Chinese gear. When one dies, you relace it with perhaps a genuine semi, and no longer have a matched pair, because the fake used a different die. This causes circuit instability and round and round you go. You always want genuine semiconductors, without exception, so I would be replacing every transistor in one of these kits with the real thing, further adding to the cost.

      Now I’m not saying don’t try to build one of these, by all means go for it, but realise what you are, and are not getting. Also realise how inexpensive the genuine article is. When you add in the cost of boards, transformer, case, wiring, connectors and time, I can’t see the value in a clone.

      Anyway, I hope this helps and don’t hesitate to let me know if you have other questions.

  5. Ralph Gonzalez

    Nice answer, thanks!

    1. Mike

      No problem at all!

  6. Lars A Gronningsater

    Hello, thanx for your review.
    On the cons list, I would add bad protection from electrostatic shock.
    I touched mine with our hoover and the main amps blew .
    It’s happened twice to me. I guess I was not careful enough, or I forgot to use an outlet with ground.
    Now I’ve switched to Japanese gear that doesn’t need or have a grounded mains.
    Now I’m thinking of selling mine with the Quad 33 pre-amp or upgrade both with new parts and phono connectors.

    1. Liquid Mike

      Hi Lars, thank you for your kind words and comments. The 405 and 405-2 are earthed by design and superbly engineered in every sense, including safety. Going a step further, the schematics of every version show that chassis earth is part of the design, so the fault you’ve described shouldn’t actually be possible with an unmolested 405 or 405-2 and a properly earthed mains cable and mains outlet. Many 405s and 405-2s I come across have been messed with and have reduced performance and safety as a result of poorly thought out and implemented modifications. This may be part of the story, or maybe there is something else going on there with the vacuum, wiring, mains outlet or amplifier.

  7. Ralph Gonzalez

    Thanks for the detailed answer. Since the time I asked this I built a DIY tube amp and also ordered a class A headphone amp from the Breeze Audio site on Aliexpress, and was pretty impressed by the parts quality. I think there exist vendors in China who are deeply enthusiastic about audio and use high quality components, servicing both the local audio community as well as hobbyists in Europe, Asia, and the Americas. In some cases this means cloning classic gear which is otherwise not available new anymore, at very reasonable prices. I’m sure there are also scams, but I suspect these are less likely with the established vendors who have reputations to protect. I also don’t think China has a monopoly on scams!

    1. Liquid Mike

      Hi Ralph, no problem and my apologies as I don’t recall your original message, nor could I find it quickly. No, China definitely doesn’t have a monopoly on scams, but a huge volume of hi-fi ‘junk’ does originate in China, unfortunately. The other issue is that most end-users, hobbyists etc, for various reasons, are unable to distinguish between fake and real parts. Many capacitors supplied with Chinese kits, for example, look like the real Nichicon MUSE, Elna Silmic etc, when they are in fact fake parts with far inferior performance. The same is true of many semiconductors and only careful testing or destructive analysis can determine the non-genuine nature and sub-standard specs of these knock-offs. Having said all of that, there is a smaller proportion of good gear from China, some of it really good, though it tends not to be the cheap stuff. The fake parts problem is pervasive and a very real problem, but I’m glad you’ve had some success with the kits you’ve built.

  8. Brian Wood

    Hi Mike just wanting to know if you can recommend a service centre in Sydney for my Quad system.
    I run a 44 preamp with bridged 405s and Quad 66 CD Player into Kef Corelli speakers.

    Its approx 30+ years old now and still sounds amazing but would like to see what updates are available for all units.

    1. Liquid Mike

      Hi Brian, great system! Unfortunately I can’t recommend any one over there. I’ve only dealt with customers who’ve had bad experiences on the east coast with things like this. Most service centres don’t offer improvements either, they tend to provide basic parts or board replacement services. Feel free to call to discuss!

  9. Brian Wood

    Thanks for the info what’s the best number and time to contact you on?
    It still runs well considering its age, got to admire British quality! so any thoughts you have would be appreciated.

    1. Liquid Mike

      Hi Brian, the number and business hours are on my home and contact pages. Look forward to chatting with you!

  10. Thomas Empacher

    I have two Quad 405s. The first is a 405-2 that I bought in 1984. It has been completely reliable over its 37 year lifespan and has never been touched internally. The second is a 405 made in the 70s that I inherited from my father. It too has been totally reliable in my ownership although there is a sticker inside indicating that it was serviced sometime in, I think, the 80s by Quad in the UK.

    Both these amplifiers have traveled the world with me. Unfortunately the older amplifier suffered some water damage when it traveled as sea cargo. It has been refinished a Toyota metallic black by a local car paint shop (it was what they had!). It looks fine but I prefer the original finish. At the same time I replaced the boards with the latest available 405-2 boards.

    Both amplifiers are in regular use. As I have more amplifiers than I need I alternate the two 405s.

    As has been noted these are superb well built amplifiers and you can listen to them for hours on end without getting tired of them. The 405-2 I bought in 1984 is probably one of the best bang for buck purchases in my lifetime.

    1. Liquid Mike

      Hi Thomas, thanks for sharing your thoughts, a lot of us love the 405 and 405-2!

  11. Jeffrey Caro

    Hi! Really enjoyed this article. When I was a broke, young 2-something back in the late 80’s I was able to charge my first entry-audiophile system with a Quad 405-2 driving Vandersteen 1-B’s and it was the most amazing setup I ever heard. I was so pleased with it. I had to part with the Quad a few years later and have mourned it ever since. Now I’ve just purchased an original 405 refurbished, (hopefully well, haven’t received it yet) and will be driving a pair of NHT 3-C’s with it. Of course, after ordering I read up on the 405-2’s better performance driving lower impedances, and was wondering how the old 405 might do with a 6-ohm load. Ironically, my other good bookshelf speakers, an old pair of PSB’s are also 6 ohm, which is obviously comparatively rare for home audio. Have you or any readers had experience with a 405 driving a 6-ohm load? Just curious 🙂

    1. Liquid Mike

      Hi Jeffrey, glad you enjoyed the article. The 405 is fine with 8 ohm loads and possibly lower, but the 405-2 is better where more current is needed. This is all technically speaking of course, in reality, you can drive 6 ohm rated speakers with a 405 and it will work just fine, just not quite as well as a 405-2. What that translates to in sonic terms is a little less grip and authority. Hopefully, your 405 has been well refurbished, as many are not.

  12. James

    I also use a Schiit Sega preamp with my Quad 405-2 power amp and I’m very happy with this combination. My setup is the solid state Schiit Sega which is longer available.
    I have also tried it with a Tube preamp but found this combination to be a little bit too rolled off at higher frequency. The more neutral Sega is a much better match.

    1. Liquid Mike

      Thanks James, the Saga (not Sega) should work well. I’ve used the better sounding Freya with a 405-2 and it’s a nice preamp. Clean, neutral preamps like these will work well with the 405 and 405-2.

  13. Bill Fearnley

    I have the matched pre amp and original 405, linn cable and castle severn with monacor yellow drivers set up in my daughter’s bedroom either side of the bed crammed into the corners and despite such a poor set up the sound staging is still very good and I can sit there for hours listening to cds via a classic rotel. A sin I know but very rewarding.

  14. Gary

    How do you think the 405 would be driving a pair of JBL 4333?
    Also, I would want to find a suitable pre-amp that has a good phono section and a remote. Any suggestions?

    1. Liquid Mike

      Hi Gary, I’m sure the 405 would do well in this role, but there will of course be better options. For specific advice, I suggest you visit my contact page as noted in the comment header and submit your question with a few more details there!

Thanks for visiting, feel free to leave a comment! For specific advice or technical assistance, please visit our Contact page.