img 5537

Stunning Rare Yamaha PX-3 Turntable Service

Still rollin’, so join me this week as I service a rare and absolutely beautiful Yamaha PX-3 direct drive linear tracking turntable.

The Yamaha PX-3 turntable is certainly rare, at least here in Australia. It’s also absolutely beautiful and in the same ilk design-wise as the equally lovely Pioneer PL-L1000 and gorgeous Technics SL-10 I’ve written about previously.

These decks and others like them represented the last great high-tech vinyl turntable push from Japan, on the eve of the introduction of the compact disc. They are, for this and other reasons, collectible and desirable machines.

BTW, you guys sick of turntable articles yet..?! There are hundreds more, I’m just writing about turntables I’ve looked at in the last couple of months at the moment, as these are fresh in my mind. We need to dig into the archives…!

Yamaha PX-3
The beautiful Yamaha PX-3, as she arrived. You can already see the extraordinary cosmetic condition of this example.

Background

This beautiful Yamaha PX-3 belongs to Scott, one of my more serious customers and Yamaha collectors. Scott hopefully won’t mind me saying this, but he is a really decent human, and people like Scott make my job of working on their classic hi-fi equipment a pleasure. I mean this in all seriousness: good customers are like gold.

So Scott has been on a hi-fi collecting mission over the past year or two, and we’ve had various conversations about classic gear. Scott has accumulated some of the pieces we’ve discussed and many others we haven’t, including the incredible, almost NOS condition Yamaha PX-3, which this article is about.

I think it’s fair to say that Scott, and quite a few others, have built at least part of their systems around conversations like these, articles like the one you’re reading today, and the few others available elsewhere on the interwebs.

If you love golden era Yamaha hi-fi equipment as much as Scott and I do, be sure to subscribe so you don’t miss articles on many more great Yamaha pieces, including many of Scott’s, like the Yamaha M-2, M-4, two Yamaha B-3s, etc.

For a video overview of the Yamaha PX-3 and my work on it, check out my first video in a while:

Yamaha PX-3 Features

The Yamaha PX-3 is a solid, well-built mid-tier direct drive linear tracking turntable from around 1981, just before the arrival of compact disc. Equipment like this is so rare these days that it seems even Yamaha has forgotten about it, naming a poxy modern class D PA amplifier the PX3, and having no reference to the original and way cooler PX-3 anywhere on their website or history. Shame, Yamaha. Don’t go buying one of those, BTW!

Yamaha PX-3
Note the deck controls in the image above. Power and speed selection are to the left, arm and automated functions are to the right. All are accessible with the lid closed. There are the usual linear tracking forward and back track sectors, which provide manual control of arm lateral position. Arm lift/lower is also available from these buttons.

Like other linear trackers, the PX-3 uses a servo control system to attempt to eliminate tracking error. The tangential alignment of a linear tracking arm does, in theory, eliminate the error, but the small amount of ‘hang’ that occurs as the arm tracks the groove due to the non-zero friction in the arm system means that there will inevitably be some small amount of ‘lagging’ induced tracking error.

A Servo motor and sensors correct for this, so the actual tracking error at any given moment is low, but rarely actually zero, just to make a technical point. It’s still much lower than with conventional radially mounted arms, however.

The other consideration with short-armed linear trackers like the Yamaha PX-3 is cartridge matching. By design, the tonearm mass of machines like these is relatively low, and this means you’ll be limited in terms of the cartridges you can use with them. The best suited will be medium to higher compliance designs like the Audio Technica AT-VM95ML I fitted here.

This eliminates many of the better low-compliance moving coil cartridges from the equation, unfortunately. There are still good MC options available, but definitely no Denon DL-103s here at the budget end and certainly no Ortofon MC-A90 or Supex SDX-1100D like I use, please people! Cartridge-tonearm matching is a science, so as always, if you need tailored assistance, our advisory service is at your service!

As usual, Audio Database has some good information about the Yamaha PX-3.

Yamaha PX-3 Specifications

As always, courtesy of our friends @ Vinyl Engine, adapted by Liquid Mike

Drive system: direct drive

Motor: 4-phase, 8-pole coreless DC Hall motor

Servo control: quartz PLL

Platter: 300mm die-cast aluminium, 1.6kg (including mat)

Speeds: 33 and 45rpm

Signal to noise ratio: 77dB

Wow and flutter: 0.015% WRMS (wowsers, that’s low)

Arm type: linear tracking

Effective length: 190mm

Effective mass: 17g (at 1.5g tracking force)

Cartridge weight: 5 to 11g (10 to 16g with sub weights)

Dimensions: 469 x 149 x 428mm

Weight: 12kg

Year: 1981

Service

This Yamaha PX-3 had likely never had service before, so this was an excellent opportunity to attend to the arm drive belts, cleaning and lubrication, and the damaged cartridge you’ll see in the images. I also took the opportunity to replace the failure-prone RIFA mains safety capacitor, which I do as a general precaution. Let’s go.

Yamaha PX-3
In this top view, we see the general layout of the deck, minus the decently weighty platter. No, it’s no Yamaha GT-2000 or Luxman PD-350, but it’s also not priced like those high-end machines. That black upper chassis structure you see is a nice aluminium casting, like the PL-L1000.
Yamaha PX-3
Sadly, the original Yamaha moving coil cartridge can no longer serve record-playing duties here and must be replaced for now, and potentially refurbished. I typically send these away for repair, but in this case, Scott asked for a new, affordable cartridge option to start with, so that’s what we did. Note the bent (along its axis) cantilever, and that it is also twisted azimuthally, or rotated about its axis. This thing is knackered.
Yamaha PX-3
Nice machined aluminium (aluminum for my valued North American readers) platter. Yes, it’s only 1.6kg, but that’s a lot better than the pustulous plastic platter of the Rega RP-1, or the wooden platters of some Pro-Ject turntables!!
Yamaha PX-3
Multi-voltage, always a winner.
Yamaha PX-3
time to access the gubbins…
Yamaha PX-3
The gubbins! Nothing outrageous here, just nicely machined and well-laid-out parts.
Yamaha PX-3
RIFA suppression capacitor is cracked and must be replaced.
Yamaha PX-3
This new Kemet part will effectively last forever.
Yamaha PX-3
Here, Ive removed the three original rubber drive belts and replaced them with three new drive belts from stock.
Yamaha PX-3
Here are those new drive belts. I cleaned the pulleys and lubricated the drivetrain and motor whilst in here.
Yamaha PX-3
And here she is, with a new Audio Technica AT-VM95ML installed, correct overhang, tracking force, azimuth and VTA dialled in. What a lovely-sounding thing she is, too.

Results

Servicing this absolutely beautiful Yamaha PX-3 was a real pleasure. I’m pleased to report that she runs perfectly now after a little care and attention, as most pieces do. I think Scott picked a real winner here. I just cannot imagine another PX-3 or any other turntable from 1981 presenting in this condition.

Yamaha PX-3
The almost perfect, pristine Yamaha PX-3, with a new cartridge. I’d like to see Scott decide on a much better cartridge than this because the deck will surely resolve all the extra information it can extract from the groove. Something in the $1500 – $2500 price range would really help this deck.

Sonically, this turntable is dead quiet, as all good turntables should be, with no mechanical noise emanating from the deck, nor any obvious hum or rumble, even with headphones. Wow and flutter is not noticeable, confirming the excellent spec, and the AT-VM95ML sounded predictably specious and rich, without any obvious emphasis of a certain part of the spectrum, nor any objectionable distortion, courtesy of the tangentially tracking tonearm.

As I always say regarding any piece of hi-fi equipment: get the best condition example you can. Good condition means someone cared for the equipment and likely had it maintained by people who cared. Nothing scares me more than a highly complex piece covered in dust, dirt and with bits and pieces broken. In fact, I often refuse such pieces.

Yamaha PX-3

A quick check on sales aggregator Hifi Shark shows that the Yamaha PX-3 typically sells for very sensible money. Most will need some TLC by this age, provided by someone who doesn’t just look at something like this and think: Recap! I’ve seen these turntables sell for $1000 – 2000 AUD, and that represents spectacular buying, so if you have the opportunity, you know what to do.

In terms of performance compared to modern turntables of the same price, well, you already know the answer to that, or you wouldn’t be here. I would take this over anything new up to about 4 or 5K AUD, no need to even think about that. No, it’s not made of leather or other ‘hi-fi hipster bro’ materials, but thank goodness! I’ll tell you what it is, though: it’s made in Japan, and that means something.

Yamaha PX-3

What does made in Japan mean? Well, generally, exceptional design and engineering, well-thought-out products that work ergonomically and technically, and that are well-made and well-finished, far ahead of designs from elsewhere in most cases. It means equipment that sounds good because Japanese hi-fi culture demands that. And, for all those reasons, it means equipment that is desirable, collectible and long-lasting. Bravo Japan.

Yamaha PX-3

Thanks!

As always, thank you for visiting. I hope you found this article informative, and perhaps it even inspires you to go and find your own Yamaha PX-3! If you have a PX-3 you’d like me to look at or any other lovely linear tracker for that matter, you are welcome to contact us.

Sidenote: Until someone creates content like this, it generally doesn’t exist, as most readers know. I’ve never seen an article like this one, that’s why I create them. A commenter on a recent article was obviously impressed and asked who “pays me” to create this content. My reply was NOBODY!

Everything here is 100% independent, ad-free, created by me, on my own dime. The work output to create it is high, though, with no AI, and everything from brain to page. This article took me four hours to create, on my day off, plus time spent working on and photographing this gem. I probably need to consider ways to make what is one of the most praised aspects of my work, pay for itself. Any suggestions would be gratefully received 🙂

Incredibly, up to 10,000 people visit liquidaudio.com.au each week, including competitors (LOL). Many want my assistance and use my content, but very few – less than 1 in 10,000 – contribute, or even say ‘thank you’. You can support my work and this one-man operation with a donation in the footer, and by liking, sharing and subscribing. Recent donors are listed in the sidebar/footer. Tell your audio friends, it really helps!


Discover more from LiQUiD AUDiO

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comment, share, like and subscribe!

Scroll to Top

Discover more from LiQUiD AUDiO

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading