The Technics SL-1200 hit the market in 1972 and there was nothing else like it. This turntable really was, and remains, a game changer.
In fact, it was so popular that over one million units were manufactured, when production finally ended in 2010. With the resurgence in vinyl, thousands of people have petitioned Matsushita (Technics’ parent company) to have the deck re-released. My feeling it that this will happen.
UPDATE – it’s happened! Technics has announced the SL-1200 will return in 2016!!
To briefly explain the nomenclature, the SL-1200 models are silver and the SL-1210 models are a gorgeous satin black. There are also various iterations that were released over time. The mark 2 is very common but the deck went up to a mark 6 release, each successive mark having better tonearm wiring, fancy piano finishes and the like.
You have to remember what the turntable market looked like when it was released. The marketplace was saturated with rumbly, wobbly suspended-chassis belt-drive decks. Most could not hold pitch correctly – Linn LP-12’s, AR’s, Sota’s and so on. These decks were nice enough to look at, but lacked the ultimate engineering precision that needed a Japanese manufacturer to build into the design. Critically, they also could never be used in the growing DJ market space, where a solid, non-wobbly deck with excellent environmental isolation was needed.
Technics engineers got together and essentially decided to design a market-busting turntable with better wow and flutter figures than had ever been seen before, along with excellent signal to noise (rumble) and immunity to vibration from the surroundings. The deck would have a non-spring mounted chassis, quality arm, quartz speed control, a strobe, pitch adjustment – the list went on and on. These features were unheard of at the time, at any price!
The SL-1200 quickly became recognised for being able to reach full speed in a quarter of a turn (madness!), having regenerative braking that stopped a record as quickly when the stop button was hit and excellent pitch precision and isolation. Studios started using them, as did radio stations that couldn’t afford the even better Technics SP-10. DJs soon also realised that you could use these decks in a noisy, vibration-rich club environment with no problems. The SL-1200 quickly became legendary in the DJ scene and remains so.
The SL-1200 series are also extremely robust, meaning that they can survive all sorts of abuse that would see ordinary decks crap out. The platter is a rubber and aluminium sandwich, which is excellent for vibration damping and the chassis is also built along the same lines, using heavy rubber and aluminium. The tonearm even features height adjustment, a very nice added bonus. The arm itself is a gimballed design with tight-tolerance bearings and it’s really quite good, better than people give it credit for.
So how do these decks sound? In a word, good! Remember, this is a mid-range direct drive deck. As such, it has lots of the best attributes of direct drive turntables, and also suffers a little for being made to sell at a certain price point. For example, pitch stability is excellent, as with most direct drive turntables. Notes from piano for example sound as close to tonally stable as they get on vinyl, limited by how centrally the hole has been punched in the record.
Rumble is also commendably low, though not the lowest available. You can do better with say a Kenwood KD-600, but you might pay more for one too. Beyond that, decks get even quieter, like say the Technics SP-10. Isolation from external noise and vibration is excellent, as you might expect of a deck designed to be used inside a nightclub. This thing has rubber feet and a heavy, rubber-damped chassis, to soak up vibration before it is picked up in the groove.
Imaging is solid and stable, but not holographic as it is on the best players. This is mostly attributable to the tonearm in my opinion. The Technics arm is good, the bearings nice and smooth with usually only a little free-play, but ultimately it is probably what lets the deck down in terms of rigidity and how the arm is mounted to the chassis. This fairly basic arm robs the music of the last word in solidity in the bass and in the imaging of the soundstage. The tonearm can be changed and a new arm mount fitted, but this is a pain in the arse and I think its better to just buy a better turntable.
One thing to do in terms of upgrades is play around with cartridges. SL-1200s often come with cheap Stanton DJ-style carts that are just awful. I like to fit Ortofon 2M Red or Blue moving magnet cartridges to these decks and they suit the low mass arm very well. I like to fit at least an Ortofon 2M Red, and then owners can upgrade the stylus assembly as they need to, at a later time. The 2M range is wonderful in that the body of the cartridge is common to all, but the stylus assembly is upgradable from Red, to Blue, through to Bronze and Black. Each time you get a better gem and cantilever, which digs more detail out of the groove due to its finer profile and lower moving mass.
You need to fit compliant cartridges to a low-mass tonearm like this. Trust me, it comes down to physics, resonance and tracking ability. Guys in forums talk about fitting Denon DL-103 moving coil cartridges to these decks and this is about as poor a match as you are likely to find, unless you like to see your cartridge wobbling from side to side as you play a record. The suspension of the DL-103 is way too firm for the low mass of this arm to control. The end result is a tonearm-cartridge resonance in the low bass area right up in the audio band, leading to mistracking, poor bass performance, accelerated record wear and poor sound. Fit a compliant cartridge – magnet or coil – to this deck and get the best out of it.
So what do I look out for when servicing these decks? I service a lot of them so I have certainly noted some trends. They are usually very dirty, so I clean dust the whole deck and arm assembly with a soft brush and then clean the platter and deck very thoroughly. This removes most of the grime that builds up over the years.
The motor or spindle bearing certainly almost always needs lubrication. I find that I need to run decks for several hours whilst checking the bearing occasionally to see if the drop or two of oil I added initially has been drawn down into the bearing. Most often, I need to add another drop or two and then leaving the deck playing for another couple of hours. You can tell then the oil has finally worked its way through when the spindle itself turns much more freely when spun between your fingers.
Look out for loose spindle bearings on these decks. Guys lean on the platter, stack things on them, drop them, throw them in the back of car and so on. Any wobble or free-play in this bearing will necesiate a replacement. Broken or missing lids are common.
Finally, look out for dodgy ‘added features’ that people seem to love to add to these decks. Things like LEDs, ridiculous platter lighting etc all spell trouble. If you are the market for a Technics SL-1200, you want a nice, original, well cared for deck.
If you want a decent direct drive deck for sensible money, from a very sensible turntable manufacturer, you just can’t go wrong with one of these. They are not quite up to the level of say a Kenwood KD-600/650 but they are a very nice mid-range Japanese deck, an excellent first proper turntable for youngsters or maybe those who’ve always longed for a proper direct-drive deck that sounds good, can be upgraded in many ways and they are very reliable. What’s not to like?!
Technics SL-1200 Turntable
Chassis / Motor8.0/10
Build / Finish8.5/10
- Technics build & reliability
- Great chassis & platter damping
- Excellent speed stability
- Very rapid platter spin-up
- Awesome bang per buck
- Often abused by DJ's
- Tonearm is average, but can be changed